Attended a seminar at the Center for Rural Studies (Sam Houston State U) and several statements were made during the presentations that got me to thinking. There were several examples given as presenters were illustrating successful communities in their discussion of community and economic development. What was unclear to me in most cases was the barometer they were using to measure success. There was no clear indication that they had any empirical evidence to substantiate their assertions. It seemed like it was sufficient for us to believe that these communities are successful because the presenter concluded they are.
This situation reminded me of when I ask participants of my entrepreneurship workshops to give me an example of a local business they consider very successful and then ask them what brought them to that conclusion. I get a variety of responses from “they have been there a long time” to “they must be successful; they live in a big nice house.” Of course there is a whole array of reasons given. However, as an economist I look to financial statements for the data on which to base an answer to such a question. Of course no one ever has that information at their disposal.
Without any baseline data it seems to me that one has a difficult time determining whether communities are successful or not when it comes to community and economic development. TCRE has a Community Assessment Matrix that is used to help residents establish baseline values upon which improvement can be evaluated. Scores are given for attributes of community and of economic development. Even though the assessment is somewhat subjective, it still characterizes the current status of a community and opens up discussions about developing action plans aimed at improvement. Subsequent assessments should help indicate whether projects resulted in improvements or not. The assessment is available upon request and assistance in its use is also available.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »